On last Tuesday, 1/5/2012. Its will be a debate in the class between group on the topic that have been organized by my Design Aesthetic lecturer, Dr.Tan Wee Hoe (Dr. Tan). My group have been given the topic of "Women are better designer than Men". My group members are Muhammad Syauqi (1st Speaker), Amirul Aleem (2nd Speaker), myself (3rd Speaker) and Muhammad Affifudin (4th Speaker). We are the negative team will be debating with Serinah (1st Speaker) ,Norliza ( 2nd Speaker), Zuhairah Mohd Nor (3rd Speaker), Nur Husna Wahid (4th Speaker) as the affirmative parts.
Women are better designer than Men?
This topic will surely raise our eyebrows because this is a debate between gender.
On to my speech or rebuttal.
"Aaaaa...Assalamualaikum and a very good evening to Dr Tan and my fellow friends...Aaaa...I as the 3rd speaker and I would like to say something about aaaa...about the sexist...Aaaa...sexist opinion that is aaa...gay..aaa...gay designer..about aaa...you know lah just now..Okay..before that,I..I would like to explain something about the...brain part..about..difference between men and women..Okay..aaa...okay..Man..aaa...man is kinda like..aaa...more into expert..expert kind of things than women. Women is aa...is like general...generalist kind of brain.Aaaa..My...aaa...my meaning is that men has more specialized...specialized brain than women that aaa...women have aa..more gene..aaa..more general..aa...more balanced brain than men.Aaaa..In that case,men are more...have more tendency to have..to be more..aaa..to be like designer..aaa...construct..construction worker...aaa...artist or..aa..in that kind of..but women that have balance in..in their brain..they..they have the tendency to be like lawyer,mother aaa..and other kind of things like..aaa...more into the talkative part".
"Okay..my second opinion is that men is more right brained that women. Okay....aa...as I said just now..emm..aaa...men is more specialized...aaa...specialized brain so that means..aaa.....disturbing..." "Okay..lawan lah" said Dr. Tan in a funny way.
"1 minute" said Dr. Tan. "Fuiyoo! In that case,men have more right brained..aaa..right brained than women..women is more to left brained side of..of the brain lah..Aaa..Okay..right brain..aa..men is more...aaa...right brain is for more creative part than women aaa...the left brain is more like into aaa...language part..of...of..accent..So,aa..for example..for example..aa..okay..men..aaa..is very impulsive...aaa..wether to talk to people just..they will say something short like yes,no,umm,whatever..aaa...so,for women.." "10 seconds." said Dr. Tan. "10 seconds only aar? em..aaa...for women, they are more talkative..the..their...aaa...able..they intend to be more perfect grammar to make it perfect like aa..hak..how's your day?what..what are you doing?to do today? and so on.So,...aaa?" "Times up."said Dr. Tan. "Aaa..Before that, I would like to conclude that..aaa...men..for me, men is more..is more better designer than women because aaa...to be a designer, you have to be more right..right handed..right brained than left brained because the..the left brain is more part to the language part than the right brain is more to the creative part."
Thank You.
NAZIRUL IZZUAN BIN ZUL AKMAR
D20111050109
Friday, 18 May 2012
Friday, 13 April 2012
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
Video Commercial
Fun, New 2011 Fanta "Chase" Commercial.
More Fanta. Less Serious.
1. FANTA "Chase" Commercial, New 2011
compared with
compared with
2. COCA - COLA Siege Advertisement Promotion
The first commercial is the short commercial animation that myself and my group will use to critique and the second is the comparison for using relativism.
The second criteria that has been set; audience should be amazed by the details of this animation after see the commercial as to compared with Coca-Cola Siege is not to be agree with. For me, the details from both of the commercial animation is like kids compared to adults. Coca-cola advertisement is really detailed on everything including the hair when breeze blows.
Next on the list is that audience will rush to store just to buy and taste Fanta soft drink after see the commercial as compared to Coca-Cola Siege. I can say that for me, Coca-cola is more delicious, tasteful than Fanta. It is maybe because that Coca-cola is an established soft drink and people will choose Coca-cola rather than Fanta.
Last criteria that I set but not least is that audience should be able to remember the starting background music that is used in the Fanta commercial after hearing it for the second time as to compared to Coca-Cola Siege. This criteria is agreeable because Fanta commercial does have a catchy background music rather than the Coca-cola Siege commercial that doesn’t use music except background sounds .
My opinion is that the characters that was been used in this commercial is really appealing and cute. It suits teenager’s style or way of life but I didn’t agree on the part that they want to know more about the product. From my perspective view of relativism, the other commercial, Coca-Cola Siege is more attractive for people to know more about the product even though Coca-Cola is already an established soft drink.
This criterion is kinda like a straight forward answer. Yes, I do believe that the Fanta commercial is enjoyable and suitable to watch during leisure time. I respects his opinion or criterion that he sets and I do agree on it but I feel that the other commercial; Coca-Cola Siege, is more enjoyable than this one because Coca-Cola Siege commercial animation is full of details using full 3D animation and more realistic compares to Fanta “Chase” commercial.
I fully agreed on this one because it is refreshing just by watching the Fanta “Chase” commercial. I feel more excited and the way that the main character of the commercial skates and runs away from the people that chases him for the Fanta soft drink is cool, fresh not to mention that the background music really suits the commercial very well.
After all the debate has been done, now I will make some proposal on how to improve more for this animation advertising commercial, Fanta “Chase”.
Firstly, for me, they should put a little bit more effort on the character design so that it can have more details like the strands of hair, appearance of the face needs more details.
Secondly, they need to improvise the camera view or the camera angle in certain parts so that it has more depth like the first person camera view for example. It really can make the commercial stands out more.
Lastly, I think that they should add more surrounding enviroments like clouds for more realistic but funky style of commercial. Even though that, I still believe this commercial have a lot of strong point rather than the negative part or weak point.
That is all for this assignment “Critique Challenge” and I will always remember and tries to practise one of many advises that Dr. Tan gave to me when in class, KNOWLEDGE IS MEANT TO BE SHARED!
RELATIVISM
The chosen short commercial animation for this aesthetic evaluation is FANTA 2012 commersial. Four criterion has been set based on relativism,
i.e.
The 4 criteria that I set on this assignment:
1) Audience should be able to remember half of the video after a long time as compared to Coca-Cola Siege.
2) Audience should be amazed by the details of this animation after see the commercial as to compared with Coca-Cola Siege.
3) Audience will rush to store just to buy and taste Fanta soft drink after see the commercial as compared to Coca-Cola Siege.
4) Audience should be able to remember the starting background music that is used in the Fanta commercial after hearing it for the second time as to compared to Coca-Cola Siege.
After watching both of the short commercial animation, I discovered that the first criteria; audience should be able to remember half of the video after a long time as compared to Coca-Cola Siege is agreeable because the animation is straight forward.
The second criteria that has been set; audience should be amazed by the details of this animation after see the commercial as to compared with Coca-Cola Siege is not to be agree with. For me, the details from both of the commercial animation is like kids compared to adults. Coca-cola advertisement is really detailed on everything including the hair when breeze blows.
Next on the list is that audience will rush to store just to buy and taste Fanta soft drink after see the commercial as compared to Coca-Cola Siege. I can say that for me, Coca-cola is more delicious, tasteful than Fanta. It is maybe because that Coca-cola is an established soft drink and people will choose Coca-cola rather than Fanta.
Last criteria that I set but not least is that audience should be able to remember the starting background music that is used in the Fanta commercial after hearing it for the second time as to compared to Coca-Cola Siege. This criteria is agreeable because Fanta commercial does have a catchy background music rather than the Coca-cola Siege commercial that doesn’t use music except background sounds .
Group Debate
Now I will do an argument with other group member that use the topic of objectivism, subjectivism and emotivism academically. I will pick each of those said with one criterion and argue.
OBJECTIVISM
I will begin with one of the objectivism criterion that my friend and as a group member,shy but talented, Syauqi has set. He said that audience should find the characters appealing to the extent that they would want to know more about the product. I respect his criterion that he sets but I agree on half of it only.
My opinion is that the characters that was been used in this commercial is really appealing and cute. It suits teenager’s style or way of life but I didn’t agree on the part that they want to know more about the product. From my perspective view of relativism, the other commercial, Coca-Cola Siege is more attractive for people to know more about the product even though Coca-Cola is already an established soft drink.
SUBJECTIVISM
Next on the list is the subjectivism criterion from another friend of mine, friendly and easy going, that is Amirulhaleem has set. Like the above, I will pick only one criterion from subjectivism that has been set to argue. The criterion that I picked is; audience should be able to enjoy after finish watching the animation from the beginning to the end during leisure time.
This criterion is kinda like a straight forward answer. Yes, I do believe that the Fanta commercial is enjoyable and suitable to watch during leisure time. I respects his opinion or criterion that he sets and I do agree on it but I feel that the other commercial; Coca-Cola Siege, is more enjoyable than this one because Coca-Cola Siege commercial animation is full of details using full 3D animation and more realistic compares to Fanta “Chase” commercial.
EMOTIVISM
Last but not least is the criterion for emotivism that has been picked by my friend, cool and clever, Affiffudin. All of the 4 criterion that he sets, I choose to go for the one that he said, audience definitely will experience vibe and excitement that fully loaded from the video for a long time.
I fully agreed on this one because it is refreshing just by watching the Fanta “Chase” commercial. I feel more excited and the way that the main character of the commercial skates and runs away from the people that chases him for the Fanta soft drink is cool, fresh not to mention that the background music really suits the commercial very well.
After all the debate has been done, now I will make some proposal on how to improve more for this animation advertising commercial, Fanta “Chase”.
Firstly, for me, they should put a little bit more effort on the character design so that it can have more details like the strands of hair, appearance of the face needs more details.
Secondly, they need to improvise the camera view or the camera angle in certain parts so that it has more depth like the first person camera view for example. It really can make the commercial stands out more.
Lastly, I think that they should add more surrounding enviroments like clouds for more realistic but funky style of commercial. Even though that, I still believe this commercial have a lot of strong point rather than the negative part or weak point.
The debate amongs us ended around 5.00 a.m in the morning and we do feel that it was worth the effort of staying all night doing this assignment. We do hope that people will appreciates our critique and comment so that I can improve more and learn more on how to critique more efficiently and correctly.
That is all for this assignment “Critique Challenge” and I will always remember and tries to practise one of many advises that Dr. Tan gave to me when in class, KNOWLEDGE IS MEANT TO BE SHARED!
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
Emotional Design - Why We Love Or Hate Everyday Things
The next task that is been given to be is to write about some of the issues in the book of Donald A. Norman's Emotional Design - Why We Love Or Hate Everyday Things. The prologue of the book is so long and I kinda laugh when I read it and made me think about things that Donald A. Norman said in his book.
Prologue
This is the first time I read a prologue as long as this but it really made me smile and think thoroughly. The intriguing part of the prologue is of course about the three tea pots. Why does he have until three tea pots but none of them he doesn't even use it? It made me think why do sometimes we buy stuffs or keep things that didn't even have any use?It does made me think hard. I even can't understand why does I buy an action figure, Freedom Gundam, that costs me RM100 without any relevance of purpose or didn't have any function for me to use. It really does a mind bobbling question.
In Donald A. Norman's case, he have three tea pots that is being display, in the alcove formed by the kitchen window even though they aren't in use, but still there they are,visible. I think that for me, he really does appreciates artwork rather that the useful side of the stuff. He said that he likes to stare at the three tea pots while drinking his tea in the morning because he enjoys to do that. Just like my case, I bought an action figure. It doesn't do me any useful things other that making poses and just for display but for me, it really lift up my mood just do poses and display it and maybe take a few pictures.
The First Chapter
One of the first chapter of this book, Donald A. Norman said that attractive things work better. A research has been done to prove just this. Noam Tractinsky, an Israeli scientist, do a research on the ATM machine that has been researched by two Japanese researchers, Masaaki Kurosu and Kaori Kishimura. They both had set up two ATM machines just to prove that attractive things work better. Both ATM machines are very similar except that the buttons and screen had been arranged attractively. The Japanese found that the attractive ones were perceived to be easier to use. Noam Tractinsky couldn't believe it and claim that the research had flaws so he redid the research again. He said that aesthetic preferences are culturally dependent and Israelis are action-oriented. He was so surprised of what the outcome of the research. It was more convincing result than in Japan and labeled it as "were not expected".
I think that people are more attracted to attractive things rather than ugly ones. The researches also proves it from my personal experiences also I kinda agree on what Donald A. Norman said.
On another issues, he said that, science now knows that evolutionary more advanced animals are more emotional than primitive ones, the human being the most emotional of all. People do intend to do things according to their emotions.
Emotions do play a critical role in our daily lives like helping assess situations like good or bad, safe or dangerous. Emotions can be categorize in two and that is positive and negative. Positive emotions can be critical on the purpose of learning, creative thinking and much more. Like stated in this book, a psychologist name Alice Isen and her colleagues have shown that being happy broadens the mind to think creatively. For example, if we were to answer a question regarding about what to do when we were to be caught on a building on fire, what would we do? If we were calm and think creatively, we can think of many ways to escaped rather than relying on the emergency exit.
Negative emotions on solving things only focus on trying directly to solve the problem but on the other hand, positive emotions affects our thinking and tries to solve the problem not just focusing on the problem. They will tend to assess the problem than make not just one way to solve it. So, emotions really aid us on making choices and many more things.
That is just some of the things that I pointed out on chapter one. Now on to the next chapter.
The Second Chapter
In this chapter, Donald A. Norman describes that they are three level in design: visceral, behavioral, and reflective. It's still true that, products should be functional, but now he explains why they should be beautiful and have an emotional impact as well. This three level plays an important part in shaping one's experience and also require a different approach by the designer based on the designers experience.
Designing for the visceral level means designing what the senses initially perceive, before any deeper involvement with a product or artifact occurs. Visceral design is about emotional impact. It consists on three dominating factors that is look, feel and sound. These three factors are linked together and consistent to people and their cultures. It's about the first initial reaction. Visceral designers always looks for a positive reactions like "I want it", "How much does it cost", and so on. This is emotional impact.
Next is the Behavioral level. Designing for the behavioral level means designing product behaviors that complement a user’s own behaviors, their own assumptions, and mental models. Behavioral level needs to focus on both use and performance of the design. This level has four components and that is function, understand-ability, usability and physical feel.
Function comes first among the four components because it needs to fulfill the needs and can be tricky. I said tricky because people's needs are not as obvious as we might thought. The designers have to watch their costumers to understand on how they will use a product. For example, a car's cup holder. The design is so simple yet so useful. Just stick it on the windshield of a car, and WALLAH. Simple yet useful.
Understand-ability is next in the component. The secret is to make a proper conceptual model. If we receives continual feedback on the model,it is good so that we can make improvement on the model. Many of the products gives inadequate feedback. To be effective and achieved a good understanding, we needs to enhance the conceptual model and indicates what is happening and what remains to be done on the model.
The next component is usability. It's a complex topic to talk about. Product that does what is required and understandable, may still not be useful to other people. For example, guitar,violin, piano and so on. There are certain critical test for a product such as "How well does the product perform?" or "How comfortable does it feel to use?" and other questions related.
The last component is physical feel. Designers tends to worry a lot about the physical feel of their products. This can make huge differences in our appreciations and can be critical towards to our behavioral assessment of a product. Why does we even bother about physical feel?Isn't the use is more important?Physical feel is important because we are biological creature. We have interaction between our sensory systems and the environment. We tends to like beautiful things.
Now it's the reflective design level. Reflective design is kinda like a message, culture or a meaning of a product. It's also kinda like an image that we presented to others. For an instance, Apple products. The logo is Apple.
Attractiveness on a visceral level is the response entirely on the surface look of an object. Beauty is on the reflective level is influenced by knowledge, learning and culture. Advertising can work on both visceral and reflective level.
I'll explain a bit about the reflective level of product. Reflective level shows person's overall impression. It is about long-term customer experience on service, providing a personal touch and good interaction.
By NAZIRUL IZZUAN BIN ZUL AKMAR ( D20111050109)
We can see that Apple is so famous. Anywhere we go, people knows this brand. The essence of reflective design is it's all in the mind of the beholder. Now the question is to prefer function or fashion? There are two things that is attractiveness and beauty.
Attractiveness on a visceral level is the response entirely on the surface look of an object. Beauty is on the reflective level is influenced by knowledge, learning and culture. Advertising can work on both visceral and reflective level.
I'll explain a bit about the reflective level of product. Reflective level shows person's overall impression. It is about long-term customer experience on service, providing a personal touch and good interaction.
So, a human-centered approach works well for behavioral design, but it is not necessarily appropriate for either the visceral or the reflective side.
The Third Chapter
"Wow, yes, I like it, I want it." It is, as one designer explained tome, the "wow" factor. The reflective side of emotion is involved as well, for the saved bottles can serve as reminders of the occasion when the beverage was ordered or consumed. Because both wine and expensive water are sometimes purchased for special occasions, the bottles serve as mementos of those occasions, taking on a special emotional value,becoming meaningful objects, not because of the objects themselves,but because of the memories they produce, and, as I said in chapter two, memories can trigger the powerful, long-lasting emotions.
What are the design factors in play here, where pure appearance is the issue, beauty that is all on the surface? This is where those genetic, hard-wired biological processes play their role. Here the designs are opt to be "eye candy," as sweet to the eye as the taste of candy to the mouth. Yet just as sweet-tasting candy is empty of nutritional value,so is appearance empty beneath the surface.
Human responses to the everyday things of the world are complex, determined by a wide variety of factors. Some of these are outside the person, controlled by designer and manufacturer, or by advertising and such things as brand image. And some come from within, from your own, private experiences. Each of the three levels of design - visceral, behavioral, and reflective - plays its part in shaping your experience. Each is as important as the others, but each requires a different approach by the designer. Visceral design is what nature does. We humans evolved to co-exist in the environment of other humans, animals, plants, landscapes, weather, and other natural phenomena. As a result, we are exquisitely tuned to receive powerful emotional signals from the environment that get interpreted automatically at the visceral level.
In conclusion, the three chapters kinda reflect on the emotional side of a human characteristics. It also includes the three level that is visceral design, behavioral design and reflective design. We must take our emotions seriously so that we can be more positive, creative thinking and more open to the enviroment.
By NAZIRUL IZZUAN BIN ZUL AKMAR ( D20111050109)
Saturday, 3 March 2012
Letters Upon The Aesthetic Education Of Man
Good day to Dr Tan Wee Hoe, my aesthetic lecturer. I'm looking forward to be teach by you Dr Tan. My name is NAZIRUL IZZUAN BIN ZUL AKMAR, D20111050109 was been asked to do a research or so call analysis about a book and give my opinion and also a bit of what I understand about the letters in that book.
I was asked to make a critique about a book title "Letters Upon The Aesthetics Education Of Man" by J. C. Friedrich Von Schiller. I will begin by telling a bit about the author J. C. Friedrich Von Schiller. He did notable work in history and philosophy, and in the department of esthetics especially, he made significant contributions, modifying and developing in importance respects in Kant and on this book, he gave the philosophic basis and indicates clearly and persuasively his view of the place of beauty in human life.
I will do some analysis and will try to point out some arguments and critique in all the letter and do some elaboration or explain my understanding about what he was trying to say. I will also give some opinion on the critique so that it backs the critique that I made.
THE FIRST LETTER
In the 1st letter, the author, Friedrich Schiller, has been given the authority to do a research about beauty by a certain person.
"Little exercised in formal rules, I shall scarcely incur the risk of sinning against good taste by any undue use of them; my ideas, drawn rather from within than from reading or from an intimate experience with the world, will not disown their origin; they would rather incur any reproach than that of a sectarian bias, and would prefer to succumb by their innate feebleness than sustain themselves by borrowed authority and foreign support."
I think that Schiller was researching about what can be define as "beauty". He does a research based on what the society think is beauty or not. He does it by incur any reproach or bias towards what other thinks as beauty. Schiller also tries to prove that beauty isn't supposed to be nice or something like that but is determine by the usefulness of that object and also he wants to prove that the society was a hypocrite to think that way. What makes you happy defines as beauty for some but sometimes it can be the other way around. For me,it will be differ from others perspective based on their moral experiences of describing beauty.
THE SECOND LETTER
Now we move to the 2nd letter of this book. One of the sentences in that letter is like this.
"For art has to leave reality, it has to raise itself bodily above necessity and neediness; for art is the daughter of freedom, and it requires its prescriptions and rules to be furnished by the necessity of spirits and not by that of matter."Schiller tries to make a correlation with art. For him, it just like art because in art,we need to think more creatively and freedom on thinking. Art is not based on the fact that beauty is beauty but it can be mean a whole lot more and different that it. For example, the picture below.
PABLO PICASSO - Femme en Pleurs,1937.
The picture above is a Pablo Picasso's art in 1937 entitled "Femme en Pleurs". By that picture, there are people that recognized this painting as beauty and worth a lot of money. It differs from the other thoughts because they can define this painting by experiences. For a none art lover, they will think this picture is hideous. Schiller also tries to explain free from the political legislation and tries to place himself in the center of someone's shoe to make a judgement on what is beauty or not depends on the individuals. So I can understand why Schiller tries to define beauty by individuals because he doesn't want to be bias and true to himself.
Myself also agrees with Schiller that art has to leave reality because if we don't do that,we never will make or produce something creative. We need to use our imagination to some extend so that we can produce something that can be call an art. Schiller also tries to convince the receiver of this letter that freedom is another way of thinking something beauty.
Myself also agrees with Schiller that art has to leave reality because if we don't do that,we never will make or produce something creative. We need to use our imagination to some extend so that we can produce something that can be call an art. Schiller also tries to convince the receiver of this letter that freedom is another way of thinking something beauty.
THE THIRD LETTER
The third letter that I read is that Schiller tries to implement nature to his thoughts or idea on defining beauty.
The more older we get,the more experiences we will received depends on our own attitude of handling things. If we do good, good karma will come to us. I agree with Schiller said that to prevent physical society from ceasing for a moment in time, while the moral society is being formed in the idea; in other words, to prevent its
existence from being placed in jeopardy, for the sake of the moral dignity of man. I said that because moral value can shape a man's heart for goodness and also good for the society.
So that ends my post for all fifth letter and I hope that it'll bring something good or a good thought for the good of mankind. Beauty can be described in many ways depending on the level of thinking of a person and can't be thought as one description only.
Thank you for reading my blog and I hope I can get any kind of feedback to improve my learning experiences in life.
"Man is not better treated by nature in his first start than her other works are; so long as he is unable to act for himself as an independent intelligence, she acts for him."I think that in this statement, Schiller tries to explain that we should be independent and accepts any challenges that is brought in front of us so that we can make our own solution on how to face it and implement good moral values as well. I think for me the meaning of the word "nature" that is being used is that Schiller is describing that word as our own natural habit or in other word instinct.
The more older we get,the more experiences we will received depends on our own attitude of handling things. If we do good, good karma will come to us. I agree with Schiller said that to prevent physical society from ceasing for a moment in time, while the moral society is being formed in the idea; in other words, to prevent its
existence from being placed in jeopardy, for the sake of the moral dignity of man. I said that because moral value can shape a man's heart for goodness and also good for the society.
THE FOURTH LETTER
Let's move on to the fourth letter. On the fourth letter, I will state one of the issues inside of the fourth letter.
In that statement, I think that mechanical artist is a person that doesn't appreciates art or true meaning of beauty alas will never understand the true meaning of beauty. For fine artists,they will appreciate the same set of art or beauty that has been given to mechanical artists and improve or other word is used it wisely. It brings back to the point or issues that has been stated on the second letter that everybody has it's own definition of beauty."When the mechanical artist places his hand on the formless block, to give it a form according to his intention, he has not any scruples in doing violence to it. For the nature on which he works does not deserve any respect in itself, and he does not value the whole for its parts, but the parts on account of the whole. When the child of the fine arts sets his hand to the same block, he has no scruples either in doing violence to it, he only avoids showing this violence. He does not respect the matter in which he works, and more than the mechanical artist; but he seeks by an apparent consideration for it to deceive the eye which takes this matter under its protection."
THE FIFTH LETTER
In the fifth letter of this book, I will point out one of the issues contained in that letter and that is:
"Man paints himself in his actions, and what is the form depicted in the drama of the present time? On the one hand, he is seen running wild, on the other in a state of lethargy; the two extremest stages of human degeneracy, and both seen in one and the same period."From my understanding on the above issue or statement, I can say that a man must be responsible on the actions that he has done. We should think carefully before we act or do something so that it doesn't have any bad consequences. It will kept the balance and beauty of the society that we lived in and also we shouldn't be arrogant or egoist on the things we do and kept being humble so that society doesn't think us a bad influence.
So that ends my post for all fifth letter and I hope that it'll bring something good or a good thought for the good of mankind. Beauty can be described in many ways depending on the level of thinking of a person and can't be thought as one description only.
Thank you for reading my blog and I hope I can get any kind of feedback to improve my learning experiences in life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)